Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ajit Batra Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ajit Batra Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Demonetisation Cash Sales of Pharmacy Are Legal Tender, Not “Unexplained”: S.68 Addition Deleted—ITAT Delhi Assessee, running a medical store under the name Batra Medical Store, faced addition of ₹19.68 lakh u/s 68 on account of cash deposits during demonetisation period, despite having declared income u/s 44AD. AO & CIT(A) treated cash deposits as unexplained, alleging violation of demonetisation notifications & non-maintenance of doctors’ prescriptions/identity proofs. ITAT Delhi condoned delay & allowed Assessee’s appeal on merits. Trib...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930