Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Confirms Client Funds Are Not Advocate’s Income, Deletes U/s 69A Addition

Case Law Details

Case Name
Rishi L Anandani Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement
Rishi L Anandani Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur) GST Clients’ Cash ≠ Unexplained Money— Advocate’s Bank Deposits Were Clients’ Tax Money – No Enquiry, No Evidence, No 69A-  ITAT Deletes 69A Addition Assessee, an advocate practicing in Income Tax & GST, declared income of Rs.3,98,320. Case was selected for limited scrutiny to verify cash deposits during demonetisation. AO added Rs.4,49,000 u/s 69A as unexplained money, holding that Assessee failed to give acceptable explanation for deposits of Rs.3,41,000 in current account & Rs.45,000 in savings account in old currency. Assessee ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,510

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *