This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Confirms Client Funds Are Not Advocate’s Income, Deletes U/s 69A Addition
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Rishi L Anandani Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Raipur
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Rishi L Anandani Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)
GST Clients’ Cash ≠ Unexplained Money— Advocate’s Bank Deposits Were Clients’ Tax Money – No Enquiry, No Evidence, No 69A- ITAT Deletes 69A Addition
Assessee, an advocate practicing in Income Tax & GST, declared income of Rs.3,98,320. Case was selected for limited scrutiny to verify cash deposits during demonetisation. AO added Rs.4,49,000 u/s 69A as unexplained money, holding that Assessee failed to give acceptable explanation for deposits of Rs.3,41,000 in current account & Rs.45,000 in savings account in old currency. Assessee ...




