Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Additional Evidence Leads to Remand of Section 54F Farmhouse Dispute

Case Law Details

Case Name
Ameetsingh Ajitsingh Rajpal Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2011-12
Advertisement
Ameetsingh Ajitsingh Rajpal Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) Farmhouse vs Residential House Dispute – Additional Evidence Admitted- Pune ITAT Remands 54F Claim Assessee, engaged in real-estate business, filed return at Nil. Assessment u/s 143(3) resulted in additions including denial of deduction u/s 54F amounting to Rs.92,85,214/-. AO held that investment was not made in a “residential house” but in a farmhouse. CIT(A)/NFAC deleted additions relating to interest & unsecured loans u/s 68, but upheld the denial of 54F exemption. Before Tribunal, Assessee argued that the authorities below erred...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,641

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *