This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Additional Evidence Leads to Remand of Section 54F Farmhouse Dispute
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ameetsingh Ajitsingh Rajpal Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2011-12
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Ameetsingh Ajitsingh Rajpal Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)
Farmhouse vs Residential House Dispute – Additional Evidence Admitted- Pune ITAT Remands 54F Claim
Assessee, engaged in real-estate business, filed return at Nil. Assessment u/s 143(3) resulted in additions including denial of deduction u/s 54F amounting to Rs.92,85,214/-. AO held that investment was not made in a “residential house” but in a farmhouse. CIT(A)/NFAC deleted additions relating to interest & unsecured loans u/s 68, but upheld the denial of 54F exemption.
Before Tribunal, Assessee argued that the authorities below erred...




