Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Santosh Shankar Gujar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Santosh Shankar Gujar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) CIT(A) Order Non-Speaking—Key Issues on 54/54F, Net Consideration & Technical Glitch Not Examined; Entire Matter Remanded The Assessee, an individual who did not file the original return u/s 139, received ₹2,37,00,000 on sale of immovable property and rent of ₹2,18,500 (with TDS). Based on NMS/AIMS information, AO issued notice u/s 148 on 31.03.2021. Because of technical glitches, the Assessee could not file the return on the portal. He responded manually, filed sale deed, rental details, computation etc. AO issued notices u/s 142(1) on 08.07...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930