Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vinaya Prasanna Kulkarni Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Vinaya Prasanna Kulkarni Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The assessee, a housewife, filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] against an assessment order passed under section 147 read with section 144 for the assessment year 2019–20. The assessment involved additions of ₹1,00,00,000 under section 69A on account of alleged unexplained fixed deposits, along with taxation of interest income of ₹88,656. The assessee contended that the fixed deposit of ₹50,00,000 had been reported twice, resulting in an incorrect addition of ₹1,00,00,000, and that the interest income w...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031