Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ravinder Kumar Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Ravinder Kumar Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Set-Aside Assessment Not a Licence to Review Past Decisions: Penalty Deleted-AO Cannot Revive Penalty on Income Already Accepted in Original Assessment – Fresh Penalty in Remand Proceedings Held Invalid In this appeal, Assessee challenged the penalty sustained by CIT(A) arising from penalty u/s 271(1)(c). Tribunal observed that the additional income of ₹58,85,666 was voluntarily offered in the original return & AO, while completing the original assessment on 28.12.2007, had not initiated any penalty on this sum. AO, in the set-aside assessme...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Ad Hoc Commission Cap Without Comparables Invalid; Section 40A(2)(b) Inapplicable:Bengaluru ITAT Mumbai ITAT Restricts Bogus Purchase Addition to Gross Profit Element New Charitable Trust Cannot Be Denied 12AB Registration for Limited Activities: Mumbai ITAT Bengaluru ITAT Allows Fresh Challenge to Reassessment & Section 80P Disallowance Bengaluru ITAT Allows Success Fee as Transfer Expense Under Section 48 View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031