Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ravinder Kumar Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ravinder Kumar Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Set-Aside Assessment Not a Licence to Review Past Decisions: Penalty Deleted-AO Cannot Revive Penalty on Income Already Accepted in Original Assessment – Fresh Penalty in Remand Proceedings Held Invalid In this appeal, Assessee challenged the penalty sustained by CIT(A) arising from penalty u/s 271(1)(c). Tribunal observed that the additional income of ₹58,85,666 was voluntarily offered in the original return & AO, while completing the original assessment on 28.12.2007, had not initiated any penalty on this sum. AO, in the set-aside assessme...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930