NFRA issues Order under Section 132(4) of Companies Act, 2013 against CA Amit Vinay Chaturvedi for lapses in DHFL audit. Penalties imposed and sanctions applied
NFRA issues Order under Section 132(4) of Companies Act, 2013 against CA Jignesh Mehta for lapses in DHFL audit. Penalties imposed and sanctions applied.
Explore the government’s plan to establish GST Appellate Tribunal Benches nationwide, the eligibility criteria for members, and the surge in pending appeals over Central GST.
CESTAT Delhi held that once the goods are cleared for home consumption after examination and assessment, unless there is an evidence to support, demand u/s. 28 invoking extended period of limitation cannot be raised unless there is evidence of collusion or willful mis-statement or suppression of facts are proven.
Income tax authorities could not step into the shoes of businessmen to determine how much expenditure should have been incurred for the purpose of business. as an organization incurred both operating expenses as well as non-operating expenses for running the business and there were certain expenses which were not allocable to a particular activity.
Introduction: Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 87, presented by Shrimati Mala Roy, probes into crucial aspects of India’s Income Tax scenario for the Financial Year 2022-23. The question seeks information on the percentage of people filing returns, the total income tax collected, and the annual plan and non-plan expenditure of the Income Tax Department. Detailed […]
Dive into the details of India’s GST collections for FY 2022-23. Uncover factors affecting figures, pending claims, and government initiatives for recovery and reform
Discover the latest developments in the engagement of CA firms by PSBs. Explore changes in concurrent audit policies, RBI directives, and the number of firms involved over the past 3 years
SRSS Agro Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India: Gujarat High Court to examine validity of Notification No. 09/2023-Central Tax extending period for proceedings initiated by Revenue Department
CESTAT Delhi held that revocation of customs broker license unjustified as there is no evidence that shows that the customs broker was aware about the mis-declaration of weight of pan masala as declared in the shipping bill.
