Bombay High Court held that declarant making voluntary disclosure for availing benefit of SVLDR Scheme is ineligible for applying under the scheme if it was subjected to audit as on 30th June 2019.
Petitioner submitted that it is not in dispute that the Petitioner falls in the category of case under Section 125(1)(f)(i) of Finance Act as on 30 June 2019, there was no enquiry/investigation pending against the Petitioner and at the most the same could be as initiated by way of notice dated 28 August 2019 by the Deputy Commissioner (Anti Evasion) CGST, Belapur.
CESTAT Chennai held that Revenue cannot take a different stand when the Revenue has accepted the principles laid down in a previous case. Accordingly, demand cannot be sustained.
Calcutta High Court held that non-filing of GST return vis-à-vis cancellation of GST registration, an opportunity of hearing should be granted to the petitioner who failed to file the GST return as incurred heavy loss and accordingly was under tremendous mental stress.
ITAT Chennai held that a small delay of 9 days in filing of an appeal condoned on the basis of reasonable cause as Chartered Accountant was busy in filing of return of Income and GST returns.
CESTAT Delhi held that additional incentive received by the dealer for meeting certain targets is in the form of trade discount and is not a payment for any service. Accordingly, service tax not leviable on the same.
Rajasthan High Court granted bail for person accused for alleged offences under GST as main accused has already been released on bail.
Supreme Court remanded the matter for fresh consideration in respect of exemption u/s 2(15) or section 11 in respect of publication of advertisement for consideration in light of Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority.
Accused admitted to have orchestrated the fake ITC fraud involving 05 fake firms, which have issued goods less invoices and passed on fraudulent input tax credit of GST amount to Rs.24 crores.
Assessee was unable to furnish any cogent explanation supported by evidence to establish that the consultancy charges paid are not in the nature of FTS.
