GST Department has decided that it will Not file Review Petition Against the Supreme Court Decision Against IGST Levy on Ocean Freight in Civil Appeal No. 1390 of 2022 filed by Union of India & Anr. Vs. M/s. Mohit Mineral Pvt. Ltd F. No. 275/11/2022-CX.8A Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue (Central […]
International Financial Services Centres Authority Act, 2019 (50 of 2019), the Central Government hereby directs that certain provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013) as specified in column (2) of the table below, shall apply with such exceptions, modifications and adaptations as specified in column (3) of the said table, to financial products, financial services or financial institutions in an International Financial Services Centre, namely:—
CESTAT observed that the products in question would be classifiable under CTH 85177090 and not CTH 85176290 based on HSN and the Departmental Circular could not run contrary to the Judicial Pronouncements.
Excise and Taxation Department, Government of Haryana had identified a list of 373 active registered taxpayers of State jurisdiction who had not filed FORM GSTR-3B up till March 2021. These taxpayers were liable to be cancelled under the provisions of Section 29 of the HGST Act, 2017.
ITAT Pune held that depreciation on items like stainless steel table, tools, trollies used by scientist or lab technicians in laboratory are used for production of vaccine/ other is allowable at the rate applicable to plant and machinery
Reason 1: Anti-profiteering provisions are Ultra vires of Article 246A of the Constitution Reason 2: Constitution of NAA is contrary to law. Reason 3: Anti-profiteering provisions are ultra vires to Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution
V.C. Infra Vs Commissioner of State Tax (Bombay High court) Heard. 02] On 18/02/2022 the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax passed an adjudication order directing the petitioner to satisfy the demand of Rs.8,43,502/-. The petitioner being aggrieved by the aforesaid, preferred an appeal before the appellate authority On 02/08/2022, the said appeal came to be […]
When the show cause notice itself clearly says that petitioner should file written statement within seven days of receipt of the notice, we fail to understand as to how 1st respondent could have arrived at such a conclusion.
Under Get Quote page of Exchange Website of Listed Entity, wherever listed, would display that company is non-compliant with SDD, from next trading day till Exchanges have satisfactorily verified that company has completely complied.
In any event, in accordance with the mandate of law, the appeal effect order has to be passed within three months of passing of the appeal order.
