According to the amended provisions of Section 285BA(1)(k)of the Income Tax Act, 1961, some prescribed reporting financial institutions need to furnish a statement of financial transaction or reportable account (previously called as ‘Annual Information Return (AIR)) in connection with some specified financial transactions done by them during the financial year to the income tax department.
The Listing Regulations 2015 will apply to the following securities on recognized Stock Exchange(s): Specified securities listed on Main Board or SME Exchange or Institutional Trading Platform; Non-Convertible Debt Securities, Non-Convertible Redeemable Preference Shares, Perpetual Debt Instrument, Perpetual Non-Cumulative Preference Shares;
Here, I want to share some RULES which I followed for my CA and CS preparations. These are not noting tips or like, but these are some rules by which you can control yourself as well as your work or study. So please take a look at following rules:-
The Finance Act 2015 has introduced a major change to the definition of residential status of companies vide amendment to Section 6(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) which is likely to have significant impact with respect to foreign companies.
Who can conduct Secretarial Audit? Only a member of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India holding certificate of practice (company secretary in practice) can conduct Secretarial Audit and furnish the Secretarial Audit Report to the company. [Section 204(1) of Companies Act, 2013]
There has been much controversy over the above issue. Much complications have taken place in comparison to earlier years in respect of filling of Audit Reports and as well as Income Tax Return. Some years ago, in the tax audit cases, the due date for filling was October which was reduced to September. Tax- payers are complying to the requirements introduced every year otherwise they are forced to pay penalties.
Vide Notification No.23/H.A.6/2003/S.60/2015 dated 24th September, 2015 the State of Haryana has amended Rule 49A of Haryana Value Added Tax Rules, 2004 in what appears as a fresh effort to rope more developers to opt for the 1% composition / Lumpsum scheme by introducing few changes and allowing fresh 60 Days to join this Notification from 24th September, 2015 itself.
In the case of CIT vs. Suman Dhamija, the Supreme Court held that CBDT Instruction specifying monetary limits for filing appeals applicable only to appeals filed after that date and not to pending appeals.
Glen Villiams Vs. ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)- Assesse was a dealer of bakery products, filed its return. During assessment, it was found that assesse represented certain amount towards sundry creditors in its books.
CIT Vs.Pudumjee Pulp & Paper Mills Ltd. (Bombay High Court) Assesse received interest on inter-coporate deposit which was offered to tax in earlier years. Subsequently, assesse made certain provision for bad debts.
