"09 January 2013" Archive

Reassessment Notice u/s. 148 notice issued by a non-jurisdictional AO is not valid

M/s. Indorama Software Solution Ltd. Vs ITO- Ward 9(2)-1 (ITAT Mumbai)

Section 148 mandates issue of notice before assessment, reassessment or computation u/s 147. As per section 148, it is mandatory that the Assessing Officer shall serve on the assessee a notice required him to furnish a return. The expression "Assessing Officer" used in the section 148 means 'the Assessing Officer vested with the jurisdict...

Read More

Warranty provisions not to be added for calculation of book profit for MAT

CIT Vs Becton Dickinson India Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

The facts of the case are that the assessee which is engaged in the business of manufacture and trading of medical consumable devices and diagnostic equipment for use by the health care professionals, medical research institutions, industry and general public etc. had claimed provision for warranty service. It had contended that this prov...

Read More

TPO cannot determine ALP of Project at NIL if Assessee submit all relevant documents & bills

M/s Castrol India Ltd. Vs Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax (ITAT Mumbai)

In our opinion, the exercise of ascertaining ALPs has to be done by the TPO keeping in view the well laid down scheme in the relevant provisions of the Act and addition, if any, on account of TP adjustment, has to be made only after doing such exercise. We, therefore, restore this issue to the file of the AO/TPO with a direction to do su...

Read More

S. 54F benefit available even on Value exceeding actual consideration due to deemed fiction U/s. 50C

Shri Raj Babbar Vs ITO-11(1)(3) (ITAT Mumbai)

Raj Babbar v. ITO - Based on the factual matrix of the present case, where the assessee invested total full value consideration of Rs. 16,87,000/- (as per the SRO) in the residential house, which is one house only as it has only one kitchen, and these FVC is less than the invested amounts of 17,65,752/-, during the specified period, the a...

Read More

Amount disallowed u/s. 40(a)(ia) not eligible for deduction u/s. 80IB

The D. C. I. T. Vs Shri Rameshbhai C. Prajapati (ITAT Ahmedabad)

It is settled principle that the deeming fiction created under any provisions of the Act cannot be imported into a beneficial provisions of the Act. In this case, the addition made on account of disallowance of expenditure is due to the deeming fiction created by the penal section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. Thus, the effect of the same cannot ...

Read More

Assessee entitled to relief U/s. 91 in respect of tax paid in Bhutan on income earned in Bhutan

Hindustan Construction Co Ltd Vs The Dy Commr of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai)

The Assessing Officer has computed the income from Bhutan operations at Rs. 68,63,57,400/- and included the same in the total income of the assessee, then the relief u/s 91 of the I T Act is allowable @ 8.53% on the said income, which is subjected to tax in both the countries. Accordingly, we direct the Assessing Officer to give relief u...

Read More

Reassessment not justified if no failure by petitioner to disclose truly & fully all material facts

Surat District Co-op Milk Producers Union Ltd Vs Income Tax Officer (Gujarat High Court)

We notice that in the return filed by the petitioner, in addition to claiming deduction of gross income of interest and dividend of Rs.1,81,27,606 under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, the petitioner further provided various details. For example, in the Annexure-VII to the return, such deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) was bifurcated into d...

Read More

Looted amount of Assessee recovered from Police after completion of Search operations cannot be taxed under block assessment

The Commissioner of Income Tax-II Vs Shri Nirankar Nath Mittal (Allahabad High Court)

Applying the ratio of the judgment in Chandra Prakash Agrawal (supra) to the present case, we find that the Tribunal did not commit any error in recording findings that since nothing was found in the search operations on 26.10.1995 and that though the warrant of authorisation under section 132A was issued on the following day on 27.10.199...

Read More

Penalty to be set aside if revenue accepts that Assessee is eligible for immunity u/s. 271(1)(c) although he is not eligible

D.C.I.T, CC-1 Vs Shri Sheo Kumar Kajaria (ITAT Kolkata)

The hearing was closed at this stage, pronouncing the result of these appeals by the Revenue against it; it being the common contention of both the parties that the provision of Explanation 5 to section 271(1)(c) stood attracted and satisfied in the instant case for the relevant years....

Read More

CBI raids premises of four Customs officials in bribery case

CBI REGISTERS A CASE AGAINST FOUR OFFICIALS OF CUSTOMS & ONE DRI OFFICIAL IN AN ALLEGED BRIBERY CASE; CONDUCTS SEARCHES             The Central Bureau of Investigation has registered a case against four officials of the Customs Department & a Deputy Director, DRI; one Representative of a Kolkata-based private firm in an...

Read More
Posted Under: Income Tax |

Search Posts by Date

December 2021