NC Notification No. 22/2012-Income Tax Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) number S.O.234(E), dated the 15th March, 2007, issued under clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial number 6, “PBMA’s Kantalaxmi Shah Eye Hospital” by The Poona Blind Men’s Association, 82, Rasta
NC Notification No. 21/2012-Income Tax Whereas by notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) number S.O. 121(E) dated 12th January, 2009, issued under sub-section (1) read with clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial number 25, “Mid-day meal project in Andhra Pradesh” by Iskcon Food
NC Notification No. 20/2012-Income Tax Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) number S.O.915(E) dated the 27th August, 2002, issued under clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial number 1, “Construction of building, Auditorium, Ayurvedic Clinic, School building, Administrative
NC Notification No. 19/2012-Income Tax Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) number S.0.458(E) dated the 30th March, 2006, issued under clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial number 16, “Hospital project” by Sevasangh Sarvajanik Hospital Trust, Modasa – 383315, District
The existing provisions of section 276C, 276CC, 277, 277A and section 278 of the Income-tax Act provide that in a case where the amount of tax, penalty or interest which would have been evaded by a person exceeds one hundred thousand rupees, he shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to seven years and with fine.
It is proposed to provide that the provisions of section 271AAA will not be applicable for searches conducted on or after 1st July, 2012. It is also proposed to insert a new provision in the Act (section 271AAB) for levy of penalty in a case where search has been initiated on or after 1st July, 2012. The new section provides that,-
It is proposed to amend the provisions of section 149 so as to increase the time limit for issue of notice for reopening an assessment to 16 years, where the income in relation to any asset (including financial interest in any entity) located outside India, chargeable to tax, has escaped assessment.
1. Budget 2012 – Share premium in excess of the fair market value to be treated as income 2. Budget 2012 – Reopening time limit Increased to 16 Years for income in relation to asset located outside India. 3. Budget 2012 – Penalty on undisclosed income found during the course of search at 10 pc, 20 pc, 30 pc
Under the existing provisions of section 139, every person is required to furnish a return of income if his income during the previous year relevant to the assessment year exceeds the maximum amount which is not chargeable to tax. The return of income has to be furnished in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner and setting forth such other particulars as may be prescribed.
In order to curb the practice of laundering of unaccounted money by taking advantage of basic exemption limit, it is proposed to tax the unexplained credits, money, investment, expenditure, etc., which has been deemed as income under section 68, section 69, section 69A, section 69B, section 69C or section 69D, at the rate of 30% (plus surcharge and cess as applicable). It is also proposed to provide that no deduction in respect of any expenditure or allowance shall be allowed to the assessee under any provision of the Act in computing deemed income under the said sections.
