Follow Us :

Archive: 01 May 2011

Posts in 01 May 2011

Interest u/s 234B due to lower deduction as per an order issued u/s 195

May 1, 2011 1208 Views 0 comment Print

M/s Texas Instruments Incorporated v DDIT (International Taxation) The assessee has not approached the deductor to deduct the tax at lower rate. It is the deductor who approached the department claiming that the payments to be made to the assessee are not chargeable to tax in India and to determine the chargeability. Where all payments made to non-resident are subject to deduction of tax at source u/s 195, the interest u/s 234B is not leviable on the non-resident.

Case studies of TDS on reimbursement of expenses

May 1, 2011 7695 Views 0 comment Print

Amounts received towards reimbursement of expenses can, under no circumstances, be regarded as a revenue Receipt and is not chargeable to income-tax (Reliance was placed on the decisions of the Kolkata HC in the case of Dunlop Rubber Co. Ltd and that of the Delhi HC in the case of Industrial Engineering Projects). CIT v. Siemens AG (310 ITR 320)

Applicability of section 40(a)(i) to payment towards off the-shelf software

May 1, 2011 826 Views 0 comment Print

It held that the real transaction of the granting of the licence in respect of copyrights in computer programmes had been camouflaged by entering into a chain of the agreements between MS Corp and the group entities. On an in-depth analysis, it was evident that the end users made payments in respect of the granting of licence of copyright in computer programmes. Hence, the payments made by end-users were taxable as royalty in the hands of G.

Sec 197 – Certificate for Lower Deduction- Non availability of financial statements of the past 3 years cannot result in failure of the mechanism under Rule 28AA

May 1, 2011 1973 Views 0 comment Print

ub clause (i) of Rule 28AA (1) refers to the average rate of tax as determined by the total tax payable on estimated income as reduced by advance tax and TDS as a % of the payment referred to in section 197 for which application has been made. Sub clause (ii) refers to the average of the average rates of tax paid by the assessee in the last 3 years. Hence in the present case sub clause (ii) will not apply and sub clause (i) will apply. Failure of assessee to file e-TDS return may result in independent consequence in law including penal consequences under section 271 but does not justify rejection of an application filed for lower deduction of tax under sec 197.

TDS on Payment towards equipment hired from overseas entity

May 1, 2011 3948 Views 0 comment Print

The assessee was engaged in the business of marine dredging and port construction. It was awarded a contract at Visakhapatnam Port Trust. For the purpose of executing the contract of dredging the assessee hired equipment from MA, Netherlands. During the relevant AYs, the assessee made payments to “MA” in respect of usage of the equipment. The AO was of the view that the equipment hired by the company constituted PE of the Netherland entity, MAin India. The AO held the assessee to be in default within the meaning of section 201 since it had not deducted tax at source u/s 195. On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals), however, set aside the order of the AO. DDIT v. Dharti Dredging & Infrastructural Ltd

Prior approval of AO u/s 195(2) not mandatory if a valid CA certificate is obtained

May 1, 2011 679 Views 0 comment Print

ADIT Mumbai vs Tata Communications – Copyright article is distinct from copyright per se and payment for copyright article, therefore, cannot be treated as payment of copyright, which could be brought to tax. Liability to deduct tax is a vicarious liability and it can be invoked only when primary liability survives. Since the US company itself did not have any tax liability in respect of the payments, the vicarious tax liability did not survive either

CBDT issues new Circular substituting old Circular on refund procedure for excess TDS on payments to residents

May 1, 2011 7121 Views 2 comments Print

A recent circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), Circular No. 2/2011 [ F. No. 385/25/2010-IT(B)] (new Circular) dated 27 April 2011, outline the procedure for refund of excess payment of tax deducted at source (TDS) from payments to residents. The new Circular is applicable for refunds pertaining to the period up to 31 March 2010. The procedure for refunds for the period from 1 April 2010 is governed by a specific provision in the Indian Tax Laws (ITL) dealing with centralized processing of quarterly TDS statements. The refund for the period after 1 April 2010 will be granted based on data furnished in the statements, subject to rectification of apparent inconsistencies, without the requirement of a separate claim for refund.

TDS on payment of daily overseas allowances to foreign company

May 1, 2011 855 Views 0 comment Print

If the taxpayer was not required to deduct tax at source and could not be declared assessee in default, the question whether the payment was in the nature of fees for technical services or in the nature of reimbursement for the expenses incurred or whether the Tax Treaty overrides the provisions of the ITA, need not be gone into.

Information technology skills will boost women’s participation in crucial sector – UN

May 1, 2011 477 Views 0 comment Print

Greater efforts to support girls and young women to acquire skills in information and communications technologies (ICTs) could help address projected shortages of manpower in those professions, the United Nations telecommunications agency said today, marking the first “Girls in ICT Day.”

Cyber crime – RBI advises banks to set up whistle blowing system

May 1, 2011 1033 Views 0 comment Print

Concerned over rising incidents of cyber crime, the Reserve Bank of India has suggested banks to put in place a strong whistle blowing system as well as reward employees who help prevent frauds. Appropriate mechanisms need to be established in banks…including transaction monitoring teams in banks and to investigate them (disputes or suspicions raised by stakeholders) thoroughly. Banks should have a well publicised whistle blowing mechanism, RBI said.

Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031