Income Tax : Explore the rules and regulations governing cash transactions in real estate deals to ensure tax compliance. Learn about permissib...
CA, CS, CMA : जानें जीएसटी और आयकर एक्ट में नकद संव्यवहार के नि�...
Income Tax : Dive into critical tax regulations and provisions, from related party payments to cash disallowance, and learn how they impact you...
Income Tax : Discover why Section 40A(3) limits cash payments and promotes a cashless economy, including reduction of black money generation. P...
Income Tax : Learn about Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, which disallows deductions for cash expenditures exceeding Rs. 10,000. Explore r...
Income Tax : It is suggested that there should be a positive provision under the I.T. Act that any transaction involving more than Rs.3,00,000/...
Income Tax : Detailed analysis of Ramanlal Jivrajbhai Patel vs ITO case from ITAT Ahmedabad. Learn about judgments on business expenditure unde...
Income Tax : In PCIT Vs Mahabir Jute Mills Lts., the Allahabad High Court ruled that if books of accounts are not objected to, the AO cannot di...
Income Tax : Calcutta High Court ruling states payments by supervisors to individual labourers, each not exceeding Rs. 20,000, cannot be disall...
Income Tax : Analysis of Bharat Jaroli vs PCIT case by ITAT Indore, highlighting AO's failure to scrutinize cash payments under Sec 40A. Detail...
Income Tax : Read the full text of the ITAT Chandigarh's decision in the case of Manuj Jain HUF Vs PCIT. The assessment order was upheld, rejec...
Learn about Sec 269SS, 269ST & 269T of the Income Tax Act & how they affect businesses. Analysis of these sections & their importance for maintaining business success.
MSEDCL is a State under Article 12 of Constitution and cash payments made to its franchise/agent is covered under Rule 6DD(b). Therefore, disallowance under Section 40A(3) is not justified.
ACIT Vs Cellbiz Services (ITAT Kolkata) CIT(A) has categorically mentioned that the cash book, purchase register and all individual invoices where cash transaction had taken place have been thoroughly checked and it is found that not a single such transaction actually exceeded the threshold limit of Rs.20,000/-. In view of the aforesaid factual finding given […]
ITAT Chennai held that disallowance u/s 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act sustainable as aggregate of the payments made to a single party otherwise by an account payee cheque drawn on a bank or account payee bank draft exceeds Rs.20,000/-in a day.
Once, it is established that these payments are for construction contract and particularly the AO has made disallowance by invoking the provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act, no disallowance can be made by invoking the provisions of section 269SS of the Act for levy of penalty u/s.271D of the Act.
Velankanni Constructions Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) The assessee being resident firm is stated to be engaged in civil construction. The assessee could not produce bills or voucher for blue metal jelly purchase, brick purchase and sand purchase. The reasons adduced were that the assessee undertook work at remote places and was dependent on local supplies. […]
Govind Ramprashad Baheti Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) The assessee admittedly runs Baba Ramdev Krishi Seva Kendra involving primarily rural customers engaged in agricultural activities. And that he carries out his business activities regarding sale of various agricultural products only. There is further no dispute that the recipient herein is also engaged in very line of […]
ITAT Chennai held that payment towards purchase of wet grinders and accessories were mainly made to a cottage industry and accordingly such payment is not hit by the provisions of section 40A(3) as payment made to a cottage industry is excluded under rule 6DD(F) of the Income Tax Rules.
Grit has been purchased by assessee from petty persons who are illiterate and who make their living by breaking stones by hand tools and they do not possess PAN Cards has not been proved to be false or untrue.
ITAT Kolkata held that the transaction of purchase of old gold jewellery in exchange of sale of new jewellery is covered under rule 6DD (d) and hence exempted from the provisions of section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. Further, there is no violation of provisions of section 40A(3) as there is no actual transaction of payment of cash.
