Sponsored
    Follow Us:

section 269SS

Latest Articles


Commonly Found Irregularities In Tax Audit Report

Income Tax : Learn about common irregularities in tax audit reports for AY 2023-24, including reporting gaps in Forms 3CA/3CB, SA 700, and sect...

December 13, 2024 31413 Views 0 comment Print

Section 269SS: Cash Transaction Rules, Penalties, Exemptions & Case Laws

Income Tax : Learn about Section 269SS, its cash transaction limits, penalties under Section 271D, exemptions, and important court rulings on t...

September 12, 2024 3483 Views 0 comment Print

Various Threshold Limits under Income Tax Act

Income Tax : In Respect of exemptions, deduction etc Income Tax Act, 1961 imposes various threshold limit. Like in respect of Tax Rates or in r...

September 6, 2024 364331 Views 44 comments Print

Summary of Section 269SS, 269ST and 269T & reporting in Tax Audit Form 3CD

Income Tax : Understand the provisions of Sections 269SS, 269ST, and 269T under Indian tax law, their implications, and reporting requirements ...

August 26, 2024 3639 Views 0 comment Print

FAQs on Disallowance of cash expenses or limit on cash transactions

Income Tax : Understand key provisions on disallowance of cash expenses, limits on cash transactions, and penalties under Sections 269T, 269SS,...

August 24, 2024 1896 Views 0 comment Print


Latest News


Clean Transactions, Cleaner Economy, Go Cashless, Go Clean

Income Tax : DON’T √ Accept cash of Rs.  2,00,000 or more in aggregate from a single person in a day or for one or more transactions r...

March 1, 2019 1557 Views 0 comment Print

SIT report: Restrict Cash Transaction/Holding to curb black money

Income Tax : It is suggested that there should be a positive provision under the I.T. Act that any transaction involving more than Rs.3,00,000/...

July 14, 2016 23926 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Judiciary


Penalty u/s. 271D deleted as cash payment made at one go before sub-registrar: ITAT Amritsar

Income Tax : ITAT Amritsar held that there is no violation of provisions of section 269SS of the Income Tax Act when cash payment was made at o...

March 10, 2025 2355 Views 0 comment Print

Section 271D Penalty Proceedings Void if Quantum Assessment Quashed

Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashes penalty under Section 271D as Section 153C assessment was declared void for lack of incriminating material, cit...

March 9, 2025 117 Views 0 comment Print

Section 271E penalty cannot survive if underlying assessment order annulled: SC

Income Tax : Supreme Court rules on penalty under Section 271E of the Income Tax Act in CIT vs. Jai Laxmi Rice Mills. Find out how assessment o...

February 14, 2025 609 Views 0 comment Print

Section 269SS Not Applicable to Broker Acting as Agent or Facilitator of Payment

Income Tax : ITAT Chennai ruled that brokers facilitating land deals are not liable under Section 269SS as they act on behalf of clients and do...

February 11, 2025 6003 Views 0 comment Print

Section 271D Penalty: Limitation Period Commences from ITO’s Reference to Addl. CIT, Rules HC

Income Tax : In the recent ruling Hon'ble HC have observed that penalty proceedings, initiated u/s 271 D is barred by delay & laches as period ...

February 10, 2025 516 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Notifications


CBDT notifies more modes of e-payments; 6DD limit reduced to ₹ 10000

Income Tax : Notification No. 8/2020-Income-Tax- CBDT has notified Other electronic modes by inserting New Income TAx Rule 6ABBA. It also amend...

January 29, 2020 13392 Views 0 comment Print

CBDT amends form 3CD to revise reporting U/s. 269SS & 269T

Income Tax : In the Income-tax Rules, 1962, in Appendix II, in Form No. 3CD, for serial number 31 and the entries relating thereto the followin...

July 3, 2017 130173 Views 9 comments Print

Section 269SS and 269T applicable to NBFC: RBI

Fema / RBI : Section 269SS and 269T of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the requirements under the Income Tax Act, 1961, as amended from time to time,...

March 9, 2017 20790 Views 0 comment Print


Penalty not to be imposed unless Assessee acted deliberately in defiance of law

February 22, 2005 1879 Views 0 comment Print

The apex court in Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. State of Orissa had long ago settled the law that penalty is not to be ordinarily imposed unless the party either acted deliberately in defiance of law and was guilty of conduct contumacious or dishonest or acted in conscious disregard of its obligations. Penalty will also not be imposed merely because it is lawful to do so.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31