Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : Karnataka High Court advocates for Uniform Civil Code to accelerate equality for all women, regardless of religion or caste. ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court quashes adultery case under Section 497 IPC, stressing women are not property and citing the example of Draupadi ...
Income Tax : Kerala HC rules no separate challenge needed for Sec 263 remand order before appealing revised assessment; restores Malabar Instit...
Corporate Law : Chhattisgarh HC rules pension can't be recovered without legal basis, quashing recovery order against ex-govt employee and orderin...
Goods and Services Tax : Bombay HC rules GST on developer rights under a development agreement does not fall under reverse charge as per Entry 5B of Notifi...
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court rules uploading GST notices to the common portal is sufficient but often ineffective service. Court urges tax of...
Goods and Services Tax : Andhra HC allows GST refund for zero-rated services despite service exclusion in registration; clarifies scope of CGST/IGST provis...
Goods and Services Tax : Dealers registered under Value Added Tax Act (VAT Act), 2008 were duty bound to reverse or debit the input tax credit as prescribe...
Excise Duty : Gujarat High Court held that imposed a token cost of Rs. 1,000 on department for disregarding the directions by Central Excise and...
Corporate Law : Kerala High Court directs CBI investigation into the allegations of amassment of wealth disproportionate to his known sources of i...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
Madras High Court rules uploading GST notices to the common portal is sufficient but often ineffective service. Court urges tax officers to use alternate methods.
Andhra HC allows GST refund for zero-rated services despite service exclusion in registration; clarifies scope of CGST/IGST provisions.
Dealers registered under Value Added Tax Act (VAT Act), 2008 were duty bound to reverse or debit the input tax credit as prescribed under Section 13(6) of the VAT after the discontinuation of business by the operation of law.
Gujarat High Court held that imposed a token cost of Rs. 1,000 on department for disregarding the directions by Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal [CESTAT] and matter remanded for fresh de novo order.
Kerala High Court directs CBI investigation into the allegations of amassment of wealth disproportionate to his known sources of income against Chief Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister of Kerala.
Assessee-a government-owned entity, had initially filed its income tax return for the assessment year 2016-17, declaring nil income after setting off carried-forward losses and reported book profits of Rs. 26.90 crore under the MAT provisions of Section 115JB.
Madras High Court held that the existence of an alternative remedy precludes the petitioner from approaching this Court through a writ petition unless there is an exceptional circumstance.
Madras High Court held that service of notice/ order under GST by making available in the common portal is valid mode of service in terms of section 169 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Calcutta High Court held that liberty is granted to the petitioner to respond to notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act as the respondents are on the verge of bringing the assessment proceedings to a conclusion.
Delhi High Court held that facts narrated in notice u/s. 148A(b) couldn’t lead to conclusion that income has escaped assessment. Accordingly, reassessment proceedings initiated is liable to be set aside.
