Case Law Details
Case Name : The Commissioner of Service Tax Vs Wardses Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Chennai
Payment made by the first respondent/ assessee was not voluntary and was forced to make the said payment. In such circumstances, the said payment can only be construed as one made under protest. When once the said conclusion based on the above facts are inevitable, then the second proviso to sub section 1 of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, automatically comes into play.
Therefore, the conclusion of the Tribunal in having held that the first respondent made the payment under protest was well justified and the order of the Tribunal in holding that the application made by the first respond...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

