Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs SAMKRG Pistons & Rings Ltd. (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

 RELEVANT PARAGRAPH

 8. Everything revolves around clause (iii) of section 32(1). The said clause provides that in case any of the assets specified therein on which depreciation is claimed and allowed under clause (i), is sold, discarded, demolished, and if the monies payable fall short of the w.d.v, such shortfall will be allowed as deduction provided the same is written off in the books of account.

The dispute is as to whi

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Reference is invited to Explanation 1(b) to clause (iii) which has the phrase “where the building, machinery, plant or furniture is sold” which are the same as mentioned in the first clause (i). Secondly, the first clauses (i) and (ii) speak about the assets on which depreciation shall be allowed while the latter clauses (i) to (iii) talk about the extent of depreciation that shall be allowed for the first two kind of assets. Hence, in my view, allowance of Terminal Depreciation is what is the intent of the legislation.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31