This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 56(2)(x) Addition Set Aside as AO Failed to Refer Property Valuation to DVO: ITAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Naynish Harishchandra Rahane Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-19
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Naynish Harishchandra Rahane Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, considered an appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 10 November 2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2018–19. The dispute concerned an addition made under Section 56(2)(x)(b) of the Act relating to the difference between the purchase price of an immovable property and the value determined by the stamp valuation authority.
The assessee...




