Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 56(2)(x) Addition Set Aside as AO Failed to Refer Property Valuation to DVO: ITAT Mumbai

Case Law Details

Case Name
Naynish Harishchandra Rahane Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2018-19
Advertisement Naynish Harishchandra Rahane Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, considered an appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 10 November 2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2018–19. The dispute concerned an addition made under Section 56(2)(x)(b) of the Act relating to the difference between the purchase price of an immovable property and the value determined by the stamp valuation authority. The assessee...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,551

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *