This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
If AO was satisfied as to assessee’s computation of disallowance U/s. 14A, invocation of rule 8D could not be allowed
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Samvardhana Motherson International Ltd. Vs Asstt CIT & Anr. (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Samvardhana Motherson International Ltd. Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court)
The chronology of events leading up to the passing of the orders under section 143(3) of the Act, clearly shows that the assessing officer was ‘satisfied with the claim of the assessee’ while passing the original orders. Rule 8D is triggered only in a case where the assessing officer is not satisfied with the deduction made by the assessee. The reasons to believe assume and are predicated on the belief that the assessing officer should not have accepted the Petitioner’s deduction as explained and justified, albeit should...
