This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Rule 8D not applies automatically on mere existence of mixed fund to disallowance u/s 14A
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Pr. CIT Vs. Gujarat State Petronet Limited (Gujarat High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All High Courts, Gujarat High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Pr. CIT Vs Gujarat State Petronet Limited (Gujarat High Court)
The language of Section 14A of the Act is plain and clear. Before invoking Rule 8D, the Assessing Officer is obliged to indicate that having regard to the accounts of the assessee, he is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim of the assessee in respect of such expenditure in relation to the income which does not form part of the total income under the Act. To put it in other words, the condition precedent of recording the requisite satisfaction which is a safeguard provided in Section 14A should not be overlooked before go...
