Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Reopening on Mere Suspicion and Vague Copy-Paste Reasons Held Invalid

Case Law Details

Case Name
Abdul Hamid Abdul Majid Nathani Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2012-13
Advertisement Abdul Hamid Abdul Majid Nathani Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Reopening Based Only on Suspicion Held Invalid; ITAT Mumbai Quashes Entire 147 Assessment Assessee filed his return for AY 2012-13 declaring ₹26.50 lakh, which was processed u/s 143(1). Based solely on information from Investigation Wing alleging that ₹27.44 crore moved through bank accounts of the Supariwala family & might have been transferred to Assessee, AO reopened assessment u/s 147 by issuing notice u/s 148 on 28.03.2019. Reasons recorded merely reproduced the Investigation Wing letter & asserted that Ass...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,922

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *