Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Prontos Steerings Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 509/2011-SM(BR)(PB)
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/08/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Sponsored

The limitation period prescribed under section 11B for filing the refund claim is one year from the relevant date. The term ‘relevant date’ in the case where the duty becomes refundable as the consequences of judgment, decree, order or direction of the Appellate authority, appellate Tribunal or any Court has been defined in Explanation (B)(ec) of section 11B as the “date of such judgment, decree or direction.

CESTAT, NEW DELHI BENCH

Prontos Steerings Ltd.

Versus

Commissioner of Central Excise

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031