Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Premlata Bisht Bhandari Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already subscribed? Login here to access.
Premlata Bisht Bhandari Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Reassessment Quashed for Wrong Approval Under Section 151 – ITAT Holds Sanction by PCIT Instead of PCCIT is Fatal The Pune ITAT quashed the entire reassessment proceedings, holding that a notice issued under section 148 beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year is invalid if the mandatory approval is obtained from the wrong authority under section 151. The assessee had not filed a return for AY 2016-17. Based on information allegedly emerging from material seized during a search in the case of Bhagvati Developers, the Asses...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031