Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Non-Member Club Receipts Taxable Only on Profit Element: ITAT Pune

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 11807
Case Name
Poona Club Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement

Poona Club Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune)

Poona Club Secures Major Relief: Only Profit Element Taxable on Non-Member Receipts; Entrance Fees Held Capital

Summary: The ITAT Pune partly allowed the assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2017-18 against the order of CIT(A)/NFAC dated 15.09.2025 arising from the assessment framed on 28.12.2019. Following earlier decisions in the assessee’s own cases, the Tribunal restricted the additions relating to venue charges of ₹28,89,280 and dinner receipts of ₹10,72,762 from non-members and guests to the profit element at 20%, sustaining ₹5,77,856 and ₹2,14,552 respectively and deleting the balance amounts. In relation to cricket-ground charges of ₹13,47,250, the Tribunal stated that it was following the earlier decision applying a 15% rate and sustained ₹2,69,450 while deleting ₹10,77,800; the supplied editorial analysis notes that the sustained amount mathematically represents 20% of the gross receipt rather than 15%. The Tribunal deleted the entire disallowance of ₹21,36,296 relating to expenses claimed at 7.5% for earning interest on fixed deposits, following earlier decisions in the assessee’s own cases. With respect to the disallowance of ₹32,49,651 under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, the Tribunal found that the assessee’s interest-free funds substantially exceeded its investments and held that no interest disallowance was warranted, while restoring the issue to the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer for limited computation of disallowance with reference to investments yielding exempt income, subject to the directions in the order. The Tribunal also deleted the addition of ₹16,83,500 towards entrance fees from corporate members, treating the amount as a capital receipt covered by the principle of mutuality, notwithstanding the seven-year corporate membership period. Grounds 7 and 8 were general in nature, and the appeal was ultimately partly allowed for statistical purposes as per the terms indicated in the order.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,272

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.