Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

PF Delay Partly Disallowed, MAT Issue Sent Back for Verification

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 13317
Case Name
Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2006-07
Advertisement

Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)

PF Delay Partly Disallowed, MAT Issue Remanded & Flood-Loss Allowed: Ahmedabad ITAT Decides Cross Appeals in Gujarat State Electricity Corporation

Ahmedabad ITAT, Bench ‘D’, in cross appeals Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITA Nos.1596 & 1653/Ahd/2024; AY 2006-07; order dated 18-12-2025), partly allowed the assessee’s appeal for statistical purposes and dismissed the Revenue’s appeal.

On employees’ contribution to PF, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s finding that ₹76,114 relating to delayed deposits for certain months was rightly disallowed in view of Supreme Court ruling in Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd., while confirming deletion of the balance ₹36.55 lakh, holding that the June 2005 contribution was deposited within the statutory due date. Thus, both the assessee’s and Revenue’s grounds on PF were dismissed.

On enhancement of book profit u/s 115JB (₹88.90 crore), the Tribunal noted that the earlier ITAT had specifically directed verification whether the amount withdrawn from reserves was credited to the P&L account and included in net profit. As the assessee contended that the amount had already been offered, the Tribunal remanded the MAT issue to the AO for fresh verification, strictly in accordance with section 115JB. The assessee’s ground was allowed for statistical purposes.

Regarding unabsorbed business losses and depreciation, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s direction to the AO to verify and allow eligible brought-forward losses and depreciation, including pre-demerger amounts, holding that no prejudice was caused to the assessee.

On the Revenue’s appeal relating to extraordinary losses of ₹3.53 crore (loss due to flood, cyclone, fire, etc.), the Tribunal affirmed the deletion by the CIT(A), observing that the assessee had furnished requisite details earlier and that the AO failed to grant reasonable opportunity as directed in the first round of litigation.

Accordingly, the assessee’s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, while the Revenue’s appeal was dismissed in toto, reinforcing that Checkmate governs PF delays, MAT adjustments require strict factual verification, and genuine extraordinary losses cannot be disallowed mechanically

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT AHMEDABAD

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,844

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.