Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Aditya Agrawal (ITAT Jabalpur)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Aditya Agrawal (ITAT Jabalpur) ITAT Jabalpur Deletes Penny Stock Addition: Investigation Wing Report Alone Insufficient for Section 68 Addition- AO failed independent verification – ITAT upholds CIT(A)’s finding that share transaction was genuine Revenue filed an appeal against the order of CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi deleting an addition of ₹2,20,137/- made u/s 68 on account of alleged bogus long-term capital gain (LTCG) from trading in shares of M/s Safal Herbs Ltd.. Assessee, Aditya Agrawal, had filed his return declaring income of ₹5,98,850/-, including income from salary, other...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031