Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Meda Lakshminarayana Setty Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Meda Lakshminarayana Setty Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Immunity U/s 270AA Cannot Be Denied Due to Technical Glitch in Filing Form 68 – Penalty U/s 270A Set Aside & Matter Remanded – ITAT Bangalore The assessee did not file the original return u/s 139(1). Based on information available on the portal regarding salary, property sale and interest income, reassessment proceedings were initiated u/s 148. In response, the assessee filed the return declaring income and the AO completed assessment with an addition of ₹16.11 lakh, determining total income at ₹22.61 lakh and initiated pen...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930