Case Law Details

Case Name : Western Coalfields Vs. ACIT (ITAT Nagpur)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 261/Nag. 2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/06/2009
Related Assessment Year : 2003-04
Courts : All ITAT (5324) ITAT Nagpur (12)

Explanation to s. 37 (1) does not apply to “penalty” which is not of the nature of illegal / unlawful expenditure

The assessee became liable to pay “penalty” for overloading wagons under the rules of the Railways. The question arose whether the said “penalty” was disallowable under the Explanation to s. 37 (1) which provides that “expenditure incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law” shall not be allowable. HELD, deciding in favour of the assessee:

The substance of the matter had to be looked into and given preference over the form. Though the amount was termed “penalty”, it was essentially of a commercial nature and incurred in the normal course of business and was consequently allowable.

Note: The judgement also holds that provision for estimated increases in wages made during ongoing negotiations with workers pending finalization of an agreement is deductible expenditure.

GST Course Join

More Under Income Tax

Posted Under

Category : Income Tax (27916)
Type : Judiciary (12100)
Tags : ITAT Judgments (5506)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured Posts