Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Colgate Palmolive (India) Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Colgate Palmolive (India) Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Judicial Discipline Reaffirmed – PCIT Cannot Disagree With Coordinate Bench- ITAT Mumbai Quashes PCIT’s 263 Revision Against Colgate Palmolive ITAT Mumbai has quashed the revisionary order passed u/s 263 by PCIT, thereby restoring the assessment framed by AO. Tribunal held that the action of the PCIT in disagreeing with a Coordinate Bench decision in assessee’s own case for earlier year was not in consonance with judicial discipline & that mere pendency of Revenue appeal before Supreme Court cannot justify revision under section...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930