Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Punjab National Bank (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Punjab National Bank (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi Upholds Quashing of Reassessment Against Punjab National Bank – Mere Change of Opinion Cannot Justify Reopening The original scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) was completed on 27.02.2014. Later, AO issued notice u/s 148 on 22.09.2017 alleging that Assessee had failed to add provision for standard assets in computation of book profit u/s 115JB, resulting in escapement of income of Rs.35 crore. NFAC quashed reopening, holding that since assessment was reopened beyond four years from end of AY 2011-12, the proviso to sec 147 applied, requiring A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930