Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Punjab National Bank (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Punjab National Bank (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi Upholds Quashing of Reassessment Against Punjab National Bank – Mere Change of Opinion Cannot Justify Reopening The original scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) was completed on 27.02.2014. Later, AO issued notice u/s 148 on 22.09.2017 alleging that Assessee had failed to add provision for standard assets in computation of book profit u/s 115JB, resulting in escapement of income of Rs.35 crore. NFAC quashed reopening, holding that since assessment was reopened beyond four years from end of AY 2011-12, the proviso to sec 147 applied, requiring A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031