Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanath Kumar Murali Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 7647 of 2023 (T-IT)
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/05/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sanath Kumar Murali Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)

Petitioner challenged the order  u/s 148A(d)  for AY 2016-2017 & sought for quashing  148 notice before the Karnataka High Court.

Notice u/s 148A(b)  was issued to the petitioner stating

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduadte from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Minor Can Be a Transferee Though Not a Transferor of Immovable Property: SC Refusal to Pay Maintenance to Flat Owners Association is Unjustified: Karnataka HC No Violation in Payments to Persons u/s 13(3) if Trust Predates Act & Follows Trust Deed If Assessee Denies Transaction, onus shifts to AO to prove allegation with positive evidence SC decision on condonation of delay followed by Mumbai Tribunal & matters remanded View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Rajat palwal says:

    sir.
    mere 2015-2016 me 410000 rs tex se bach gye.
    eske liye 2022 me income tex department ne 148 me khata khol diya .
    and 2014 me demand de di .
    ky esse niklne ka koi pravdhan h sir

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
October 2024
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031