This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Loss on dividend stripping transactions cannot be disallowed for years prior to introduction of specific anti-avoidance provisions
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- CIT Vs M/s. Walfort Share & Stock Brokers P. Ltd. (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Citation : CIT Vs M/s. Walfort Share & Stock Brokers P. Ltd
(Civil Appeal No. 4927 of 2010 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 19422 of 2009)
Court: Supreme Court
S. 94(7) was inserted prospectively w.e.f. 1.4.2002 to disallow dividend stripping losses. If the argument of the Revenue that even transactions prior to s. 94(7) can be disallowed is accepted, it will render s. 94(7) redundant and also lead to anomalous results.
Backdrop
Ø Finance Act, 2001 inserted sub-section (7) of section 94 in the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the ITA), with effect from Financial Year (F.Y.) 2001-02, to introduce anti-...





