Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Savitri Tyagi Vs ITO (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2012--13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Savitri Tyagi Vs ITO (Delhi High Court) AO received AIR information that Assessee deposited Rs.54,00,000/- in her savings bank account & had not filed return for AY 2012-13. Notice u/s 148 was issued on 30.03.2019, followed by multiple notices u/s 142(1) & show cause notices u/s 144. No compliance was made. AO treated entire cash deposit as unexplained income u/s 69 & completed assessment ex parte. CIT(A) also dismissed the appeal ex parte due to non-appearance on five hearing dates. Before Tribunal, AR submitted that Assessee is 71 years old, with limited understanding of tax proc...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Section, Wrong Assessment: Bangalore ITAT Annuls Section 143(3) Order Passed After Search ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930