Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sea Castle An Ayurvedic And Leisure Hotel Vs ITO (Kerala High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sea Castle An Ayurvedic And Leisure Hotel Vs ITO (Kerala High Court) Appeal Dismissed for 588-Day Delay Gets Fresh Life – Assessee to Pay Rs.3 Lakh Cost- Technicalities Cannot Defeat Merits -Natural Justice Prevails The appellant, Sea Castle an Ayurvedic & Leisure Hotel, challenged the orders of CIT(A) & ITAT which had dismissed its appeals relating to AYs 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13. The dispute concerned disallowance of interest & bank charges claimed on loans from Kerala Financial Corporation. AO held that deduction u/s 43B was not allowable since the interest was unpaid ev...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930