Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Roshan Mohan Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Roshan Mohan Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) No Relief for PR Consultant- Assessee’s Attempt to Shift from 44ADA to 44AD Rejected- Agency Business Not Eligible u/s 44AD- Revised Return Invalid – ITAT Bangalore Assessee filed his original return on 08.08.2018 declaring income of ₹16,44,968. Subsequently, a revised return was filed on 29.03.2019 declaring reduced income of ₹2,47,000. The reduction was claimed on the basis that income should be computed fully u/s 44AD at 6% on turnover, instead of partly under 44AD & partly under 44ADA as done in original return. AO rejected the revised retur...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930