Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Adam Haji Amir Hamza Nadaf Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Adam Haji Amir Hamza Nadaf Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Invalid Reopening: Tribunal Holds 147 Proceedings Void Where 153C Route Mandatory- ITAT Pune Quashed ₹39.99 Lakh Addition Pune Tribunal has quashed a reassessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 on the ground that the information forming the basis of reopening had emanated from a search conducted on a third party, thereby attracting provisions of section 153C and not section 147. Assessee, an individual, had not filed return of income for AY 2017-18. Based on information gathered during a search u/s 132 on Shri Renukamata Multistate Urban Co-oper...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930