Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Machamada Ponnappa Prakash Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Machamada Ponnappa Prakash Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore: Agricultural Income Evidence Cannot Be Ignored-Matter Remanded for Fresh Verification The Bangalore ITAT dealt with an addition made under Section 69A treating bank deposits of ₹85.71 lakh as unexplained money, where the assessee claimed the same as agricultural income. The AO and CIT(A) rejected the claim primarily due to lack of supporting evidence during assessment proceedings. Before the Tribunal, the assessee furnished detailed additional evidence, including landholding records (about 55 acres owned + leased land), sale ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031