Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Indian Potash Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Indian Potash Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Bad Debt Claim Allowed as Section 36(2) Covers Income Recognised in Same or Earlier Year; Revenue’s Challenge to Higher Depreciation on POS Machines Rejected Due to Binding Precedent; Higher Depreciation on SAP Licence Upheld Because Software Qualified for Applicable Rate; ITAT Rejects Disallowance of Subsidy Write-Off Because Unrecoverable Amount Could Not Remain Taxable Income. The assessee and the Revenue filed cross appeals against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Delhi-23, for Assessment Year 2018-19. The Revenue chall...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031