HC set aside order passed with pre-set mind in violation of justice

Antony Alphonse Kevin Alphonse Vs ITO (Madras High Court)

1. The impugned order has been passed before the time prescribed for filing the reply.

2. The impugned order has been passed with pre-set mind and without considering the reply received from the petitioner.

3. There is a manifest violation of business of justice while passing the impugned order.

4. The case is remitted back to the second respondent to pass a speaking order on merits in accordance with law after considering the reply filed by the petitioner on 15.03.2021.

FULL TEXT OF

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.