Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

In this Article CA Vivek Jalan discussed about the matter of Form 67 is directory and not mandatory to claim foreign tax credit

The topic discussed on the Article are listed below.

This would avoid hardship for the assesses and will also serve the ends of natural justice. The background of the issue is that as per the provisions of section 90 read with Rule 128 and Form 67, an assessee is entitled to relief of the tax paid in foreign country on the income, which is also taxed in India, as per the prescribed guidelines. As per Rule 128, for claiming the tax credit under section 90, the assessee needs to file Form 67 along with the proof of payment of tax on or before the end of the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which FTC is claimed by an assessee [as per the recent CBDT Notification No. 100 of 2022]. In cases where the details of such foreign tax payment are available to the assessee company only after the end of the relevant assessment year, the above timeline prescribed for filing Form 67, continue to act as deterrent to claim the tax credit u/s 90 of the Act. Till now, when such FTC relief was being claimed during assessment, the assessing officers are raising objections citing non filing of such additional claim before the due date of filing the return of income & now may say it should have been claimed before end of the AY. As a result, the assesses are/will be denied tax credit for no fault of theirs, since it is impossible to make such claims in the absence of requisite details, for which Indian assesses are helpless and are dependent on the tax authorities of respective foreign jurisdiction.

However, even barring the amendment, the issue is whether Form 67 is mandatory or directory for claiming foreign tax credit. In a decision in Anuj Bhagwati vs DCIT, in ITAs No.1844 and 1845/Mum./2022, the coordinate bench of the Tribunal vide order dated 20/09/2022, while deciding the issue held that section 90/91 of the Act has not been amended insofar as grant of foreign tax credit is concerned and Rules cannot override the Act and therefore filing of Form No. 67 is not mandatory but it is directory. Following the decision, it was held in the case of NIRMALA MURLI RELWANI Vs ASSTT.

Sponsored

Author Bio

Mr. Vivek Jalan is a Fellow Member of the Institute Of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) ; a qualified LL.M (Constitutional Law) and LL.B. He is the Chairman of The Core Group on Indirect Taxes of The CII- Economic Affairs and Taxation Committee (ER); He is the Chairman of The Fiscal Affairs Com View Full Profile

My Published Posts

IBC has overriding effect over provisions of Income Tax & GST Act Mere usage of name of Foreign AE not convert a transaction into international transaction Interest u/s 36(1)(iii) allowed as deduction even for purchase of Capital Asset PMLA Act and Maintenance of records become more stringent Where unexplained income cannot be entangled in clutches of Section 69 family View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930