Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Expenses met out of company’s money could not be treated as income in hands of assessees u/s. 2 (24)(iv) if money not been paid directly to them

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2013 taxguru.in 382
Case Name
Commissioner of Income-tax, Chennai Vs C.S. Srivatsan (Madras High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement


HIGH COURT OF MADRAS

Commissioner of Income-tax, Chennai

versus

C.S. Srivatsan

Tax Case (Appeal) Nos. 48 to 71 of 2007

FEBRUARY  1, 2013

JUDGMENT

S. Vimala, J.

These 24 Tax Case Appeals have been filed by the Revenue, aggrieved over the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, covering the assessment years 1996-1997, 1997-1998, 1998-1999, 1999-2000, 2000-2001 and 2001-2002, assessment having been made against each of the Directors, namely, C.S. Narasimhan, C.S. Srivatsan, C.S. Seshadri and C.S. Varadhan, (who are brothers), raising the following common substantial questions of law:-

“(i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the amounts paid by the company towards personal expenses of the assessee cannot be taxed in its hands under Section 2 (24)(iv) as the amount was routed through the franchisee, which was the HUF of the assessee?

(ii) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in remanding the matter back to the assessing officer on the issue of receipt of commission, when the entity which is supposed to have received the commission was formed only after the survey was conducted?”

1.1. The details of each of the appeals filed are as follows:-

Tax Case Appeal No.

@ssessment year

ITA order No.

Challenged

Appellant

Respondent

48/07

1996-97

2089/M/2005

Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai

C.S. Srivatsan

49/07

1997-98

2090/M/2005

50/07

1998-99

2091/M/2005

51/07

1999-00

2092/M/2005

52/07

2000-01

2093/M/2005

53/08

2001-02

2094/M/2005

54/07

1996-97

2095/M/2005

Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai

C.S. Seshadri

55/07

1997-98

2096/M/2005

56/07

1998-99

2097/M/2005

57/07

1999-00

2098/M/2005

58/07

2000-01

2099/M/2005

59/07

2001-02

2100/M/2005

60/07

1996-97

2101/M/2005

Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai

C.S. Varadhan

61/07

1997-98

2102/M/2005

62/07

1998-99

2103/M/2005

63/07

1999-00

2104/M/2005

64/07

2000-01

2105/M/2005

65/07

2001-02

2106/M/2005

66/07

1996-97

2107/M/2005

Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai

C.S. Narasimhan

67/07

1997-98

2108/M/2005

68/07

1998-99

2109/M/2005

69/07

1999-00

2110/M/2005

70/07

2000-01

2111/M/2005

71/07

2001-02

2112/M/2005

2. The assessees in each of the batch of six cases are, C.S. Narasimhan, C.S. Srivatsan, C.S. Seshadri and C.S. Varadhan, who are the Directors of the Company, named, ‘M/s. C.R.S. Sons & Co., Limited’. The company is engaged in the business of retail-selling of silk sarees and other textiles. The said company makes all purchases from M/s. Sri Sundaravalli Collections (SSVC), which is an entity of Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) of two of the Directors of the company. M/s. Sri Sundaravalli Collections pays guarantee commission to CRS holdings, an entity in which all the four brothers are partners, representing their minor HUFs.

2.1 The company ‘M/s. C.R.S. Sons & Co., Limited’ effects its sale through franchisees, which was owned by different HUFs. These are,

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.