Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manikandan Rajapackiaeswaran Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Manikandan Rajapackiaeswaran Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)

Assessee is an individual who was deputed to Norway for a short duration of 3 months & received salary on which TDS was paid to the Norwegian Government. Assessee filed his return of income in India for AY 2016-17 but did not report salary received in Norway. AO invoked Black Money Act for AY 2022-23 although the alleged income pertains to AY 2016-17 & ACIT initiated proceedings u/s 10(2) of BM Act & treated Norwegian salary as “undisclosed foreign income & asset” u/s 3(1).

On appeal before the Tribunal,

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Further Section 14A Disallowance After Reasoned Suo-Motu Adjustment ITAT Hyderabad quashes final TP assessment as time-barred despite DRP directions Delay in Filing Appeals Condoned Despite Massive Additions and Penalty Capital Gains Addition Set Aside for Denial of Fair Opportunity Estimated Gross Profit Addition Collapses When Excess Stock Is Not Proved View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031