Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s Agrahari Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dy. C.I.T. (ITAT Lucknow)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 523/Lkw/2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/01/2018
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
M/s Agrahari Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dy. C.I.T. (ITAT Lucknow)

We find from the copy of balance sheet and profit & loss account placed at pages 1 to 3 of the paper book that assessee had filed complete particulars with respect to assets on which depreciation was The assessee has also filed chart of fixed assets placed at page No. 3 of the paper book showing claim of the said depreciation. From the above documents itself, the Assessing Officer has observed that the assessee has claimed depreciation to the extent of Rs.2,57,677/- and therefore, it cannot be said that the assessee had concealed income or had furnished wrong particulars of income. Even if it is presumed that assessee was not eligible for allowance of depreciation even then the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed as held by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Reliance Petroproducts (P.) Ltd. (supra) wherein Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that every wrong claim made by the assessee cannot tantamount to furnishing of wrong particulars of income or concealment of income.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031