Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs. S.V.S Prop mart Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCIT Vs. S.V.S Prop mart Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)

Assessing Officer has mentioned in the Assessment order about the submissions made by the assessee that the commission was not received by the assessee company on account of dispute with the said party. Since the commission income has not been settled and crystallized, the same has not accrued to the assessee company. The said contention of the assessee was not dealt with by the Assessing Officer. There was no finding given by the Assessing Officer that the amoun

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. vswami says:

    INSTANT

    xTRACT >

    UNLESS A DEBT HAS BEEN CREATED IN FAVOR OF THE ASSESSEE IT CANNOT BE SAID THAT THE INCOME HAS ACCRUED TO IT or IT HAS A RIGHT TO RECEIVE the income as held in ED Sassoon & Co Ltd. (v) CIT (1954] 26 ITR @7 (SC); Seth Pushaal Mansingka (P) Ltd. (v) CIT (1967) 66 ITR 159 (SC) and CIT (v) Ashokbhai Chimanbhai (1965) 56 ITR 42 (SC).

    So what ?! SO LONG AS THE LOWLY ao DOES NOT CARE or bother TO LEARN, or taught , HIS FIRST LESSoN ON SUCH ELEMENTAY CONCEPTS / PRINCIPLES, upheld /reminded of, courts are there to keep tutoring, at no cost to him !

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930