Virender Gupta Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Delhi ITAT Quashes 21 Search Assessments for Invalid Common Approval Under Section 153D
The Delhi ITAT allowed 21 miscellaneous applications and recalled its earlier common order after finding that it had failed to adjudicate the assessees’ additional legal ground challenging the validity of the section 153D approval. The Tribunal accepted that the legal ground had been duly raised but remained undecided, warranting recall of the earlier order under section 254(2).
On merits, the Tribunal held that the common approval granted under section 153D by the Additional CIT for multiple assessees and multiple assessment years did not satisfy the statutory requirement. Relying on the Supreme Court decisions in PCIT v. Anuj Bansal and the Delhi and Allahabad High Court rulings in Shiv Kumar Nayyar, MDLR Hotels (P.) Ltd., Subodh Agrawal, Sapna Gupta, and Siddarth Gupta, it held that approval under section 153D must be granted separately for each assessee and for each assessment year after due application of mind.
Since the impugned assessments had been framed on the basis of an invalid common approval, the Tribunal held them to be in violation of section 153D and quashed all 21 assessments. Consequently, the miscellaneous applications as well as the main appeals were allowed, and all other issues on merits were rendered academic.
Cases Discussed
- PCIT Vs. MDLR Hotels (P.) Ltd. (Delhi HC), (2024) 166 taxmann.com 327
- PCIT Vs. Anuj Bansal (SC), (2024) 165 com 2
- PCIT Vs. Anuj Bansal (SC), (2024) 466 ITR 254
- PCIT Vs. Shiv Kumar Nayyar (Delhi HC), (2024) 467 ITR 186
- PCIT Vs. Subodh Agrawal (Allahabad HC), (2023) 149 taxmann.com 373
- PCIT Vs. Sapna Gupta (Allahabad HC), (2023) 147 taxmann.com 288
- PCIT Vs. Siddarth Gupta (Allahabad HC), (2023) 147 taxmann.com 305
FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT DELHI




