Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ravindrabhai Lakshmanrav Mane Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ravindrabhai Lakshmanrav Mane Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

ITAT Ahmedabad condoned delay of 326 days in filing quantum appeal and delay of 1 day in filing penalty appeal as assessee demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay.

Facts-
Assessee has preferred present appeal against appellate order passed by the CIT(A) confirming levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. Notably, there is a delay of 326 days in filing quantum appeal and delay of 1 day in filing penalty appeal.

Conclusion-

The assessee has demo

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930