Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Eastman Industries Ltd. Vs A.C.I.T., Circle 10(1) (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2008- 09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
1. The brief facts, relevant to issue No. (iv) above, are that during the assessment proceedings, the assessee had debited a sum of Rs. 10,19,203/- under the head “Commission paid against guarantee by directors”. On being asked, the assessee explained that the assessee company had obtained working capital limits from bank which were secured by way of hypothecation of plant & machinery, fixed assets, stocks, bicycles and auto parts in process, finished goods, book debts, export bills & other receivables and goods in transit. It was further explained

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930