Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Eastman Industries Ltd. Vs A.C.I.T., Circle 10(1) (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 286/Del./2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/06/2017
Related Assessment Year : 2008- 09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
1. The brief facts, relevant to issue No. (iv) above, are that during the assessment proceedings, the assessee had debited a sum of Rs. 10,19,203/- under the head “Commission paid against guarantee by directors”. On being asked, the assessee explained that the assessee company had obtained working capital limits from bank which were secured by way of hypothecation of plant & machinery, fixed assets, stocks, bicycles and auto parts in process, finished goods, book debts, export bills & other receivables and goods in transit. It was further explained that the loans were also secured by equitable mortgage of lease hold rights of Plot No. C- 87 & C-88, Phase V, Focal Point, Ludhiana and also by personal guarantee given by two directors of the company. In lieu of this personal guarantee, the assessee company had paid commission @ 0.6% of the amount of guarantee amounting to Rs. 10,19,293/-. The details of these expenses are as under :

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
Name of the director
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031