In case two inferences of fact are possible, the one drawn by lower court will not be interfered by HC in second appeal

CIT (E) Vs Dabur Research Foundation (Delhi High Court)

The Supreme Court in Hero Vinoth (Minor) vs. Seshammal, (2006) 5 SCC 545 has also held that in a case where from a given set of circumstances two inferences of fact are possible, the one drawn by the lower appellate court will not be interfered by the High Court in second appeal. Adopting any other approach is not permissible. It has also held that there is a difference between question of law and a “substantial question of law”. Consequently, this Court finds that there is no perversity in the

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.