Case Law Details
Case Name : In re. Cairn U.K. Holdings Ltd. (AAR Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
Advance Rulings
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Cairn U.K. Holdings Ltd. In re (AAR) The relief provided for by the proviso to Section 112 is intended to cover cases where effect of inflation is not provided for. That is why the proviso specifies that the calculation of 10% of the Capital Gain should be “before giving effect to” indexation. ‘Before giving effect to’ connotes that effect has otherwise to be given. That means, the asset must be one qualified for indexation under the second proviso to Section 48 of the Act. There is no justification in not giving effect to the words used in the proviso. Nothing stood in the way of the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

